This article by Heather Mac Donald in City Journal notes one of the latest efforts by the secular left to treat crime with doctors, psychologists and sociologists, instead of police, courts and prisons; and, it will not work any better than their other crime-reduction and rehabilitative ideas.

An excerpt.

New York City mayor Bill de Blasio is turning to Chicago for lessons in how to combat Gotham’s rising gun violence—Chicago, where black teens kill each other at four times the rate as they do in New York. De Blasio and the city council will spend nearly $13 million on an initiative that treats gun violence primarily as a public-health problem, rather than a law-enforcement one, a concept championed by epidemiologist Gary Slutkin and implemented most famously in the Windy City. The new “Gun Violence Crisis Management System” will send former gang members and social workers into areas that have experienced recent shootings. The “crisis-management” teams contact feuding gang members and try to discourage retaliatory shootings. Equally central to the public-health concept, the teams refer gang members to case-management and other social programs, such as job-training, mental-health, and legal services—precisely the type of efforts that made up the city’s default response to crime before 1994, when the New York Police Department began seriously enforcing the law.

The violence-interrupter program is already operating as a pilot in five NYPD precincts; it will now be expanded to 14. Proponents attribute a 66 percent decrease in shootings in a small area of Crown Heights to the pilot effort. There’s reason to be skeptical about this claim, especially regarding the replicability of such alleged results city-wide. Chicago is simply not an encouraging model of crime reduction, to put it mildly. And the great lesson of New York’s historic crime decline is that the best way to change criminal behavior is to increase the likelihood of apprehension, through data-driven deployment tactics and proactive officer interventions. Social services have a dismal track record of overcoming the effects of family breakdown and a pathological gang culture. Their main effect is to pump taxpayer dollars into feckless “community-based” social-service groups, whose employees are often just a baby-step away in functioning from their clients, but which provide get-out-the-vote footwork for city council members.

Retrieved August 15, 2014 from